A New, More Accurate Model of Default for P2P Loans

New Accurate Model Default P2p Loans

Thanks to the unprecedented convenience of the Internet, peer-to-peer lending has become a more popular alternative for consumers to find new access to capital. Sites like Prosper and Kiva have been a go-to for borrowers who have been turned down by banks.

However, as with traditional loans, there’s always a chance the borrower will default on his or her loans.

In “Modeling Default for Peer-to-Peer Loans,” Don Carmichael, a second-year University of Houston C.T. Bauer College of Business Ph.D. candidate, claims to have developed a new — and more accurate — model for default.

The peer-to-peer lending process

For his research, Carmichael analyzed thousands of 36-month and 60-month loans issued through Lending Club between June 2007 and October 2013.

When a borrower applies for a loan through Lending Club, the company uses his or her credit score and report to generate a risk subgrade to indicate potential credit risk.

But unlike traditional loans, ordinary people fund the loans and want to see more information about where their money’s going.

One of the great benefits of the peer-to-peer lending process is lenders tend to have more information available beyond the traditional credit score and credit report — borrowers can self-report income, length of employment, homeownership (own, mortgage or rent), the purpose of the loan, and a loan description.

“We can check, for example, to see if a borrower writes in complete sentences or makes particular claims about himself in his loan application,” Carmichael writes. “[This] allows us to consider borrower characteristics not available for other kinds of loans.”

Explaining default in peer-to-peer loans

While you’ll need to see his paper for the finer details, Carmichael developed an equation based around a myriad of details including, but not limited to, the borrower’s income, revolving credit utilization and even whether or not the user-generated loan description contains end marks (periods, questions marks and the like).

According to Carmichael, Lending Club borrowers are “better credit risks if they write in complete sentences,” claiming that such a detail could serve as an indicator of education level and, by extension, creditworthiness.

Another fun fact in his research — “Generally people are honest when they claim creditworthiness … when people go out of their way to claim they’re credit-worthy, that’s actually a good sign.”

The takeaway

Carmichael drew the following conclusions from his research:

  • Income and inquiries are highly significant determinants of default.
  • Income verification or an interaction between income verification and income is insignificant.
  • Loans for debt repayment should be evaluated separately from other loans.
  • Borrowers submitting loan descriptions lacking complete sentences are more likely to default.
  • Borrowers’ claims to creditworthiness in their loan descriptions are believable.
  • Home ownership, recent delinquencies, derogatory public records and length of employment are insignificant for explaining default.
  • For a median-risk loan, probability of default rises rapidly to a maximum at 13 months and then falls 21 percent from 13 months to maturity.

Just a few things to consider the next time you fund a peer-to-peer loan!

Thinking about applying for a personal loan yourself? Check out our trusted list of personal lenders.

Photo credit: ghostwrittenebooks.com

Advertiser Disclosure

BadCredit.org is a free online resource that offers valuable content and comparison services to users. To keep this resource 100% free for users, we receive advertising compensation from the financial products listed on this page. Along with key review factors, this compensation may impact how and where products appear on the page (including, for example, the order in which they appear). BadCredit.org does not include listings for all financial products.

Our Editorial Review Policy

Our site is committed to publishing independent, accurate content guided by strict editorial guidelines. Before articles and reviews are published on our site, they undergo a thorough review process performed by a team of independent editors and subject-matter experts to ensure the content’s accuracy, timeliness, and impartiality. Our editorial team is separate and independent of our site’s advertisers, and the opinions they express on our site are their own. To read more about our team members and their editorial backgrounds, please visit our site’s About page.